The 2030 Climate Change Imperative: Three actions to take before time runs out

This audio was created using Microsoft Azure Speech Services

Our climate change emergency is developing at daunting speed. As demonstrated by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), tipping points which exacerbate the impacts of global warming — such as the melting of polar ice caps — are to rapidly be breached.

The window of opportunity for combating climate change is closing. Through modeling several climate transition scenarios, the IPCC has shown that global emissions need to be reduced by 30-50% by 2030, compared to 2018 levels, for us to have a fighting chance of limiting global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees.

Put another way, if we’re to take the objectives of the Paris Agreement seriously, then we need to get serious about making substantial progress by 2030.

Worryingly, Schneider Electric’s most recent modeling suggests that 3-5 times more emissions reductions than have currently been pledged by national governments are needed for us to be on track to meet these targets. We need to urgently do much more to meet the 2030 climate change imperative.

Luckily, there is still time to achieve this goal with today’s solutions.

Our analysis suggests it is possible to reduce emissions to the levels needed to put us back on course to reach net zero by the middle of this century, through the mass deployment and implementation of existing technologies.

To ascertain this, we evaluated energy-related CO₂ emissions, between now and 2030, for four major regions — North America, Europe, China, and the Asian OECD countries. Collectively, these regions account for 70% of global CO₂ emissions.

We modeled the impact that the mass adoption of existing technologies would have on emission levels in four sectors — buildings and construction, industry, mobility, and power generation — for these regions, and the extent to which this would allow us to get back on track globally in terms of emissions reductions.

The results show that, by 2030, we can successfully abate global energy-related CO₂ emissions in line with the IPCC’s climate transition pathways. Electrification, digitalization, and renovations to improve energy efficiency, in particular, have substantial potential to reduce emissions.

Take buildings as an example. The widespread adoption of electric and digital technologies, such as heat pumps and digital energy-management systems, could reduce building energy demand by as much as 40%.

The good news is that these technologies are already widely available. But for such emissions savings to be realized — and for us to get back on course in the 2030 climate change race — these solutions need to be adopted at an unprecedented scale and pace.

Similar trends were uncovered in the other sectors evaluated.

In other words, while the solutions needed to combat global warming exist today, they need to be adopted much faster than at current rates.

Addressing the 2030 Climate Change Imperative

So, what can we do about this? Our results point to the need for three key actions to be taken:

1. There should be a renewed focus on addressing easy to abate sectors. Within the global discourse, much attention is paid to the need to reduce emissions arising from hard to abate sectors like heavy industry and long-haul shipping. Although advancing solutions in these areas will be critical for achieving net zero by 2050, they are not yet deployable at scale. There thus needs to be a greater emphasis on increasing the uptake of already-developed green technologies in the run-up to 2030.

2. Business has a greater role to play in meeting our 2030 climate change challenge. The development of effective and efficient value chains will prove key to ensuring that greener technologies are sufficiently implemented. To facilitate this, large corporations must accelerate their environmental ambitions in the run-up to 2030 and support small-to-medium enterprises, in their supply chains, to also reduce their emissions.

3. Governments must modernize policy frameworks to facilitate decarbonization objectives. Current legislative frameworks often tacitly promote the use of less sustainable products or fuel sources. For example, in the European Union, taxation rates for electricity usage are, on average, four times higher than for the equivalent use of gas. Common frameworks should be adopted to funnel investments, monitor progress, and reward adopters of more sustainable products and practices.

The challenge we face between now and 2030 is massive. But the solutions to overcome it exist. What’s left is for us to act, with haste and without hesitation.

For full details of Schneider Electric’s 2030 climate change modeling, click here.