Upgrade or replace? Discover the most suitable option to modernise an ageing electrical switchgear

This audio was created using Microsoft Azure Speech Services

Ageing switchgear can hamper continuity of services in industrial facilities, and thus impact customers in terms of reliability, affect employee safety, and cause financial losses. In addition to potential risk to human lives, the cost of downtime is now calculated in millions of Euros per hour, according to Contingency Planning Research.

Cost of non availability

Whatever the age of switchgear network and switchboards in a power system, reliable performance and proper maintenance are more critical than ever.

The lifespan of medium voltage switchgear often exceeds three decades, which means industrial facilities may have outmoded systems that are challenging to maintain. Engineers and electrical distribution stakeholders have to decide when it’s time to update or replace ageing equipment. What drives that decision? It may be safety concerns, rising maintenance costs – or simply a need for better network visibility and management.

But here’s a common dilemma: A conflict exists between the older technologies that are in place and the industry standards that are evolving at a much faster rate. Most power plants were designed for a 30-year life span. However, energy generation companies are launching initiatives to maintain operation for 40 to 60 years. In addition, industrial facilities often have a mix of power distribution technologies that span two to three generations and use several different technology architectures (e.g., air, oil, SF6, vacuum).

The central question is how to modernise an antiquated system and ensure reliability.

The choice is whether to upgrade or replace. Once a business has examined the current state of its switchgear and considered future plans, it needs to evaluate these factors:

  • Spare parts availability
  • Maintenance costs
  • Degree of equipment wear
  • Urgency of upgrade
  • Criticality of the processes affected

In most cases, there’s no need to rip out all the equipment and start over. A retrofit solution is the least disruptive to business and the most cost-effective. The advantages of an upgrade include:

  • Asset optimisation, thus extending equipment lifespan and increasing ROI
  • Minimal downtime, which lessens the effect on production
  • Improved cash flow through scheduling an upgrade over time
  • Digitisation for better energy consumption monitoring
  • Less environmental impact, due to fewer discarded materials

What’s the biggest benefit of upgrading rather than replacing switchgear equipment? Certainly the cost savings in terms of equipment, time, labour, and production are exceptional. As a bonus, leveraging the expertise of an established manufacturer and its tested, proven solutions can give utility stakeholders peace of mind in planning and executing retrofit projects.


For a full discussion of what’s involved in a switchgear system upgrade, you can refer to the white paper, ‘Guidelines for Modernising Existing Electrical Switchgear in LV and MV Networks’ or leave your comments and questions below.

Tags: , , , ,


  • Frédéric

    8 years ago

    Bonjour quand pensé vous remplacer le compact ns car ça fait 20 ans qu il existe même si avec nsx vous L avez rajeuni il a sont âge merci

    • Georges Barbarin

      8 years ago

      Bonjour,c’est bien sur dans notre stratégie de proposer régulièrement des produits a la pointe de leur technologie. Les disjoncteurs basse tension ont généralement un cycle de commercialisation entre 15 et 20 ans. Je pense que le Compact NSX a moins de 10 ans de commercialisation, donc encore de nombreuses années devant lui.

Comments are closed.