This audio was created using Microsoft Azure Speech Services
The ongoing quest for increased efficiency and productivity is putting more and more pressure on operational and maintenance excellence. As is the need to feed fast growing businesses in new economies. This, along with the loss of experience due to an aging workforce and fewer operators actually in the plant, are combining to create the perfect storm of skills shortages. And let’s not forget the topics of sustainability and security which are only growing in importance.
To unlock the next levels of manufacturing efficiency and productivity, a transformation is needed in the fundamental approach to managing a factory or plant. Many of the drivers behind this transformation are covered by that ubiquitous concept known as Industry 4.0, and the report addressing it that was delivered by the Industrie 4.0 Working Group.
I’m talking about enabling technologies like full Ethernet IP-based networks that lay the foundation for the Industrial Internet of Things. And the new generation of offers and systems that are the cornerstones of the industrial world – like a DCS which innovates on a foundation of smart objects (more about these later) or a drive or controller with Ethernet at their core. All the work we’ve been doing in this area convinces me of one thing: that achieving these next levels of efficiency and productivity will be thanks in a large part to “smart assets,” which I believe are the building blocks of the Smart Factory.
Smart assets are the cornerstones of the Smart Factory
The traditional concept of the process control system – in particular the notion of “centralization” – also needs to be completely reassessed in order gain new ground in manufacturing efficiency and productivity. We need to move away from the concept of a process control system that collects information about the process and its assets in order to facilitate production decisions, and move towards a process automation philosophy built around smart objects which contain all the available data about that asset.
More simply, we need to move from a process control system that has a central “brain” which knows all about the assets in the factory to a model where each asset knows everything about itself.
By combining this shift with operational intelligence (big data, analytics, asset performance information), we can empower a factory’s assets to optimize their own productivity and efficiency within the broader context of the process control system. They become “smart” assets. 
The enablers of smart assets
Smart objects – Smart objects are reality today, already showing up in next generation DCSs. Extensible and open, smart objects generate a digital model of a physical asset in the virtual environment. They have an unlimited number of “facets” to which we can attach different data sources. Any user, be they operator, maintenance engineer, energy manager or plant manager, can access these facets directly to find all the information that is available about that particular asset.
The key here is “context.” Bringing data together and combining different dimensions and parameters in the context of one another provide new insights into the performance of an asset. For instance, combining power and process data can give us valuable energy information in the context of production. These are just two examples that are already working for many of our customers. Imagine the level of insight into a plant that will be achieved when five or ten different data sources are combined.
Hyperconnectivity – This also enables the Industrial Internet of Things by bringing accessibility to smart objects. Smart objects can only contribute to the Smart Factory if they are fully interconnected within the very framework of the factory, accessible from the field and right through to the enterprise level of a business.
Hyperconnectivity is already available. Building a fully transparent network from field to enterprise that bridges all domains, including power, process, building management and IT, brings the full richness and context of data from anywhere in the plant (eg smart sensors) and makes it visible and accessible. This hyperconnectivity is the key to unlocking the full power of the Industrial Internet of Things. It’s all about the data, but if you can’t access it, all the data in the world won’t help you.
Intelligence – Generating value from smart assets comes from being able to move from passive process automation and decision support towards intelligent, semi-autonomous decision making systems. For example, today the process control system receives single dimension sensor data from an asset. If a certain fixed threshold is exceeded, a “passive” alarm is generated, requiring operator intervention to assess the relevance of this alarm and the risk that it might be an early indicator of process deviation from the plan. Injecting intelligence into the process control system, and more specifically into smart assets, enables those assets to leverage their available data sources to get to the next generation of, say, alarm management where we can avoid routine intervention and become semi-autonomous. With the help of this intelligence, we evolve from alarm management to risk management. 
The value of smart assets
Building a smart factory with smart assets at its core means reaching those desired new levels of productivity and efficiency. It means smart products that leverage advanced traceability, connectivity and intelligence. For businesses, it means being able to address the talent crunch through more autonomous, smarter process automation systems that require less human intervention. It means more flexibility in manufacturing by allowing late changes and robustness to perturbations in the supply chain. All of these advances facilitate dramatically new business models that deliver innovative value to their markets. These values, all delivered by the smart factory, cannot exist without a solid foundation of smart assets.
What’s your vision of the Smart Factory and the role of smart assets?
Conversation
HARINDER
11 years ago
Good article ,….I have query about Tangible & Intangible difference between complete automation & net access Vs Manual Human control . Kindly share it with some case study
David Orgaz
11 years ago
Dear Harinder,
Can you please elaborate and the insight you are looking for?
Are you referring to the difference in operational efficiency between a plant managed fully by an experienced operator vs a semi-autonomous decision support system?
Thanks in advance for the clarifications.
David
Deepak Achuthashankar
11 years ago
Hi David,
I’m an Industry Analyst from Frost & Sullivan, a global growth consulting company.
We are currently organizing “Virtual Briefings” on Industry 4.0 to share our perspectives on the future of factories.
Could we please connect on that?
Best regards,
Deepak Achuthashankar
David Orgaz
11 years ago
Hi Deepak,
Looking forward to connecting with you for the virtual briefing next week…
Kind regards
David Orgaz
Jeroni Martorell
11 years ago
Hello David,
Very interesting
Please could you give me some real example and advantages of central process control vs smart assets control ?
second question, does any “auto learning ” process control exist in the market ?
Thanks
Thanks
David Orgaz
10 years ago
Hi Jeroni,
Thanks…
To your question1: An example showing the potential of distributed / smart asset control vs central control:
Thermosolar application with each mirror being an assset on the field. Is a distributed solution with thousands of nodes that can operate independently (smart assets). They can manage in an autonomous mode the position of the mirror, their own diagnostic, the energy consumption, etc, In fact this is a community of nodes where each one has some autonomy to operate, but all of them accomplish a mission when operating together.
2 important comments:
Hierarchy of responsibility: This principle of distributed intelligence is not against of a central process control that can play an specific task of coordination of the solar field (this is the Solar Field strategy), but each node is managing its own positioning task according to this strategy defined combined with other operating factors like the relative position of the sun to the mirror. The operational task of positioning is left to each node, managing moving paths, security areas, etc.
Combination of aspects: Each node is an active member of several aspects of the plant operation: the positioning definition, the monitoring system for operators, the asset management system, the configuration system…for each type of functionality the node has a different way to interact, but its part of all those different facets.
Main benefit are scalability and resilience of the solution.
Question 2:
There are several techniques of advanced process control that are based on auto learning and that are applied to some specific applications (neural networks, expert systems, etc.).
Smart decisions at node level:
Main challenge is being able to define the scope of autonomy of an asset, and defining which is the context of information relevant for it to take local decisions. If the scope of the decision is beyond the amount of information managed by this asset, there should be another layer on the hierarchy with a wider view of the information to take such decision (this is the balance between real time and volume of information managed).
Intelligent decisions at system level:
Then when talking about learning, the challenge is even bigger, it is not only being able to take local decisions based on the limited scope of information available, but tracking the impact of the decision in time or in a wider scope to confirm the results and apply them in further opportunities…not part of the level of autonomy of a single node, seems more a global task that could gather information and define working conditions for the local nodes to take their local decisions accordingly.
Thanks again for your questions – I hope these comments gave some clarifications?
Shreyas Satish
10 years ago
Hi David,
This is Shreyas Satish here. I am an employee of Schneider Electric India, presently on a sabbatical and I am pursuing my Management Masters degree at the RWTH Aachen university. I worked as a SAP consultant for the Bridge ERP platform within Schneider.
Presently, I have been researching on Indutrie 4.0 and the role of future ERP systems in order to enforce the vision of Industrie 4.0.
Could you please let me know, if any business unit in Schneider is working on implementation of Industry 4.0 in Schneider as a part of Smart struxure / ERP confideration or Global Supply Chain.
I would be highly interested to write my thesis in this area and continue my research.
Warm Regards,
Shreyas Satish
David Orgaz
10 years ago
Dear Shreyas,
pls contact me on my schneider-electric email and I will direct you to the right person to exchange with.
Kind regards
David Orgaz
Samir
9 years ago
The smart factory market size, in terms of value, is expected to reach USD 74.80 Billion by 2022, at a CAGR of 10.4% between 2016 and 2022. Discrete industry expected to hold the largest market share.
https://tinyurl.com/heje47a