This audio was created using Microsoft Azure Speech Services
Electrical contractors face risks on the jobsite every day. But electrical risk assessments and risk assessments for electrical installations, when performed correctly, can help reduce the overall risk of injury. Let’s take a deeper dive into this invaluable tool.
What is an electrical risk assessment?
An electrical risk assessment involves evaluating potential hazards associated with electrical systems to ensure safety and compliance. It identifies risks such as electrical shock, fire, and equipment failure and provides preventive measures to mitigate these dangers. Specifically, a risk assessment for electrical panel installation is crucial to prevent accidents during setup and operation. Proper electrical risk assessment helps protect both personnel and equipment, ensuring a safe working environment.
The importance of electrical risk assessments in ensuring safety
Electrical risk assessments play a crucial role in ensuring safety by identifying potential hazards, minimizing risks, and preventing accidents, thereby protecting both personnel and equipment.
- Prevents hazards: Electrical risk assessments identify potential dangers before they become serious issues, ensuring safer environments.
- Compliance: Ensures adherence to safety regulations and standards during electrical panel installation.
- Reduces incidents: Minimises risks like electric shocks and fires through proactive evaluation.
- Increases reliability: Electrical installation risk assessment enhances the dependability of electrical systems.
What are electrical installation risk assessments?
An electrical installation risk assessment is a procedure that helps electrical workers identify hazards, assess risks, and implement risk controls before beginning work at a site. During the assessment, a worker must weigh the likelihood of an electrical occurrent, and the severity of a potential injury.
Keep in mind that NFPA 70E, the workplace safety standard requiring this risk assessment, doesn’t detail a specific assessment procedure. Instead, it outlines the necessary elements of a risk assessment for electrical installations. It’s up to an employer to establish and continually update the actual risk assessment plan.
The case for electrical installation risk assessments
“It won’t happen to me. I’m safe.” While electrical contractors may feel confident working with electrical equipment, the potential risks of the job, including shock and arc flash, warrant extra precautions.
In many cases, safe electrical work practices, such as performing a risk assessment for circuits and other electrical installations, can help contractors avoid both shock and arc flash events.
Three steps in an electrical installation risk assessment matrix
Here are three steps required as part of any risk assessment for electrical installations.
1. Evaluate the likelihood of occurrence
The likelihood of occurrence will vary depending on the work performed. For example, there’s a higher chance of an electrical event when performing voltage testing on energized conductors than when operating a circuit breaker handle.
Equipment condition is also a factor that may impact the likelihood of an electrical occurrence, especially if the equipment is improperly rated or maintained.
Because of this, equipment maintenance documents and any relevant safety information are a must-have for electrical workers.
2. Determine the severity of a potential injury
The severity of a potential injury depends on the type of electrical occurrence.
For shock hazards, this is simple to determine. The severity of an injury relates back to the voltage and the path that current will follow as it travels through the body.
However, for arc flash hazards, the severity is based on the available incident energy at that point in the electrical system.
How do you determine the incident energy? Incident energy is the amount of energy generated during an arc flash event. Electrical contractors can estimate this by accessing circuit-specific information in the equipment documentation, such as the clearing time of the upstream overcurrent protection and the available fault current. Once the incident energy level is known, equipment should be marked according to NFPA 70E requirements in 130.5(D) so future workers can quickly identify the incident energy level during servicing.
3. Follow the risk control hierarchy
After assessing the likelihood of occurrence and severity of a potential injury, it’s time to implement risk controls based on a hierarchy. These include:
- Elimination: Temporarily eliminate the hazard to establish an electrically safe work condition
- Substitution: Substitute less-hazardous equipment, such as using non-electrical or battery-operated tools instead of cord- and plug-connected
- Engineering controls: Choose options that automatically reduce risk, including GFCI protection or factory-installed barriers
- Awareness: Alert people to the hazard by installing permanent or temporary signs, labels, barricades, etc.
- Administrative controls: Complete all front-end work, such as establishing planning processes, attending training, obtaining permits, and clarifying work procedures
- PPE: Ensure personal protective equipment (PPE), such as insulated tools, clothing, and gloves, are available when needed
Again, these risk controls will vary depending on the site and the work being performed.
To increase safety in electrical environments, contractors must be able to recognize the hazards associated with electrical energy and then take the necessary precautions to avoid those hazards. An electrical installation risk assessment is the tool to help you accomplish this — it is quite possibly the most important tool you need working around electrical equipment.
For additional training on improving workplace safety, visit your custom mySchneider portal.
Conversation
NWA Electrician
8 years ago
Great article here! Definitely going to share this with my contractors.
Diseño paginas
7 years ago
Did not know that the electricians are exposed to so much risk, not all the heroes have layer, than men of great honor, very curious and interesting your article
George Koumanos
6 years ago
As a older electrician, trained in NY by a union electrician I’ve always believed in trade practice over code. (Code is minimums and at times poor advice) All a electrician needs to see for risk assessment is 480 Volts. The start of non contact lethality. As far as working live trade practice suggests considering if its really necessary. (Millions of dollars at risk? Hundreds of lives? Management too lazy to schedule down time?) Trade practice would also require panels and control systems be serviced (rare) when the equipment can be deenergized and the equipment safely inspected, torqued and cleaned. Now you know the panel is safe to open. (Finding self tapping bolts used to secure a panel cover 1″ from load wiring is too common) As far as energizing under load for high tech a pneumatic remote works, low tech go with 30 feet of rope. Both work well. Spending money on a panel tag saying how dangerous a panel is would be better spent on proper maintenance and competent staff. Lastly I’ve worked on panels with risk assessment tags and holes on the top of the enclosure. One panel had two 1″ pieces of threaded rod inches from a hole left when a 3″ pipe was moved. Right over the busses. No one bothered to look. Would a ass tag make you feel safer?