Energy Regulations

The Risk Assessment: An Electrical Contractor’s Most Important Tool

Are you a risk taker?  Does it depend on the situation?  Does it depend on the consequences?  Can’t answer the question without knowing more information?  Congratulations, you’re well on your way to understanding an electrical risk assessment!

Most of today’s electrical workers recognize that there are two primary hazards when dealing with electricity: shock and arc flash.  While many people have experienced some level of electric shock, luckily for most of us, it was mild.

However, according to Annex K of NFPA 70E: Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace®, there are about 1,000 electrocutions each year (electrocution is a fatal electrical shock).  That is an average of 2-3 people per day, every day.  And, while relatively few of us have been exposed to an arc flash event, each year there are approximately 2,000 people admitted to burn centers with severe arc flash burns.  That’s an average of 5-6 every day.   In most cases, these incidents could have been avoided by using safe electrical work practices.

Electrical worker in PPE

You probably know that NFPA 70E is the national consensus standard that deals with electrical safety in the workplace.  But did you know that with the release of the 2015 edition, the concept of risk assessment was introduced and is required by the standard?  That’s right, electrical safety programs are now required to include a risk assessment.

A risk assessment is a procedure which identifies hazards, assesses risks, and implements risk controls according to a hierarchy of methods.  Interestingly enough, personal protective equipment (PPE) which is often the first thought related to safety, is actually the last item on the list of 6 risk control methods listed in 110.1(G).

In the context of dealing with electrical hazards, risk is usually defined as the combination of two items – the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of an injury.

Likelihood of Occurrence

The likelihood of occurrence can clearly vary with the task that is being performed, whether it’s the operation of a circuit breaker handle, removal of bolted equipment covers or voltage testing on energized conductors.   Equipment condition is also a factor, since the likelihood of occurrence increases when electrical equipment is not properly rated or maintained.  Because of this, documentation of the proper equipment maintenance is a must-have for electrical workers.

Severity of an Injury

For shock hazards, the severity of an injury is directly related to the voltage.  However, for arc flash hazards, the severity is based on the available incident energy at that point in the electrical system.  How do you determine the incident energy? Circuit-specific information, such as the clearing time of the upstream overcurrent protection and the available fault current, must be known.  It’s important to get the incident energy correct, because ultimately it will be used to select the right PPE.

Once the incident energy level is known, equipment should be marked according to NFPA 70E requirements in 130.5(D).  This helps future workers quickly identify the incident energy level when they are examining, adjusting, servicing, or maintaining electrical equipment.  Having knowledgeable, qualified people to perform the system analysis and create the markings is critical.

Clearly the concept of electrical safety is founded on the ability to recognize the hazards associated with electrical energy and then take the necessary precautions to avoid those hazards.  A risk assessment is the tool that is used to accomplish this – it is quite possibly the most important tool you can have when working around electrical equipment.

For a complimentary Arc Energy Reduction eGuide and more information on reducing risk to electrical workers, register for the Square D Electrical Contractor Portal.


3 Responses
  1. Diseño paginas

    Did not know that the electricians are exposed to so much risk, not all the heroes have layer, than men of great honor, very curious and interesting your article

  2. George Koumanos

    As a older electrician, trained in NY by a union electrician I’ve always believed in trade practice over code. (Code is minimums and at times poor advice) All a electrician needs to see for risk assessment is 480 Volts. The start of non contact lethality. As far as working live trade practice suggests considering if its really necessary. (Millions of dollars at risk? Hundreds of lives? Management too lazy to schedule down time?) Trade practice would also require panels and control systems be serviced (rare) when the equipment can be deenergized and the equipment safely inspected, torqued and cleaned. Now you know the panel is safe to open. (Finding self tapping bolts used to secure a panel cover 1″ from load wiring is too common) As far as energizing under load for high tech a pneumatic remote works, low tech go with 30 feet of rope. Both work well. Spending money on a panel tag saying how dangerous a panel is would be better spent on proper maintenance and competent staff. Lastly I’ve worked on panels with risk assessment tags and holes on the top of the enclosure. One panel had two 1″ pieces of threaded rod inches from a hole left when a 3″ pipe was moved. Right over the busses. No one bothered to look. Would a ass tag make you feel safer?